Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
manuscript:choice [2018/08/13 21:09]
daviding [Table]
manuscript:choice [2018/08/13 21:21] (current)
daviding Heuristic [Table]
Line 33: Line 33:
 Collapse? Collapse?
  
-          |                                             ←← | Environment                            →→                                       | +           |                                             ←← | Environment                            →→                                       | 
-Strategy   Placid-clustered                              ^  Disturbed-reactive                   ^ Turbulent field                           ^ +Heuristic   Placid-clustered                              ^  Disturbed-reactive                   ^ Turbulent field                           ^ 
-| Best      | ✓                                              | Can be pre-empted by competitors      | Can be decimated by external factors      | +| Best       | ✓                                              | Can be pre-empted by competitors      | Can be decimated by external factors      | 
-| Both      | Wastes resources through misplaced suspicions  | ✓                                     | Can be damaged by other parties flailing +| Both       | Wastes resources through misplaced suspicions  | ✓                                     | Can be damaged by other parties flailing 
-| More      | Raises questions on value of integration       | May be betrayed by alliance partners  | ✓                                         |+| More       | Raises questions on value of integration       | May be betrayed by alliance partners  | ✓                                         |
  
 ===== 1.3 Choose as an individual; or choose with a group? ===== ===== 1.3 Choose as an individual; or choose with a group? =====
Line 45: Line 45:
 ^                         | Group                                                                                                  || ^                         | Group                                                                                                  ||
 |                         | Acquiesce                                     | Co-respond                                              | |                         | Acquiesce                                     | Co-respond                                              |
-| Individual  | Acquiesce   | Satisfied with status quo, or Blind to flaws  | Selflessness (might be helplessness)                    |+| Individual  | Acquiesce   | Satisfied with status quo, or Blind to flaws  | Majority rules.  May limit minority privileges          |
 |             | Co-respond  | Hero if successful.  Patsy if failure         | Mutual benefit if succesful.  Shared misery if failure  | |             | Co-respond  | Hero if successful.  Patsy if failure         | Mutual benefit if succesful.  Shared misery if failure  |
  
Line 56: Line 56:
 Sins of omission are not evil?  Only since of commission are evil? Sins of omission are not evil?  Only since of commission are evil?
  
 +For the Greeks, good governance allowed the option of choice, even if it wasn't taken.  Shutting down choices causes uprisings.
  
 +Representation versus direct democracy (e.g. American governance c.f. Swiss governance)
  
 ===== 1.3 What is the context for the choice? ===== ===== 1.3 What is the context for the choice? =====
  • manuscript/choice.1534187341.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2018/08/13 21:09
  • by daviding